Guilbeau v. Durant H.m.a.

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that Guilbeau’s negligence claims were barred by claim preclusion because she failed to seek appellate review of the first dismissal, affirmed the Court of Civil Appeals’ finding that the addition of Armor was time‑barred, found the invasion‑of‑privacy claim was timely, and reversed the lower court’s dismissal of that claim, concluding it states a viable cause of action. The case was remanded for further proceedings.