Guilbeau v. Durant H.m.a.

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that the plaintiff’s negligence claims were barred by claim‑preclusion because she failed to appeal the earlier dismissal, but reversed the Court of Civil Appeals on the invasion‑of‑privacy claim, finding that the plaintiff stated a viable claim under Oklahoma law. The Court vacated the appellate decision, affirmed the trial court in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.