Thurston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insur. Co.

Summary

The court held that charging and accepting separate premiums for uninsured motorist coverage on separate policies does not expressly provide for stacking under the amended statute. Because the policies were issued or renewed after the amendment and contained a clear anti-stacking endorsement, State Farm was entitled to summary adjudication as a matter of law. The district court's order was affirmed and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.