In Re Ovec Generational Purchase Rider Audits Required by R.c. 4928.148

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Public Utilities Commission’s orders, holding that the commission’s exclusion of expert testimony and the PJM report, its findings on the companies’ burden of proof, its analysis of OVEC’s must‑run commitment strategy, and its compliance with R.C. 4903.09 were not unlawful or unreasonable, and any error in applying a presumption of prudence was harmless. The court rejected all challenges raised by OMAEG and OEC.