State ex rel. Conomy v. Rohrer

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth District Court of Appeals’ dismissal of Christopher P. Conomy’s petition for writs of mandamus and procedendo, finding that a mandamus cannot control judicial discretion, the judge lacked jurisdiction to rule on the pending motion, and Conomy had an adequate ordinary‑law remedy. The Court also denied Conomy’s ancillary motions, including a motion to disqualify counsel and a motion for a special master.