State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Summary

The court denied mandamus relief and statutory damages for two latent body-camera recordings because Clark did not establish that the recordings existed when requested or currently exist. It denied relief concerning eight kites as moot because the department provided the requested records and denied damages because Clark did not show that the allegedly omitted audit-log entry was part of the requested records. The court held its ruling on the post orders in abeyance and ordered the department to submit them under seal for in camera inspection.