Seelbaugh v. Montgomery Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Div.

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ dismissal of Seelbaugh’s writ of prohibition, holding that the domestic‑relations court is not a proper respondent, that both the court and the child‑support enforcement agency have subject‑matter and personal jurisdiction, that Seelbaugh’s due‑process arguments do not defeat that jurisdiction, that adequate ordinary‑law remedies were available, and that he failed to comply with a local rule requiring a security deposit or affidavit of indigency.