Vormestrand v. Craig

Summary

The court affirmed the amended judgment awarding Vormestrand primary residential responsibility and the denial of Craig's motion for a new trial or reconsideration. It held that although the district court misstated the threshold for considering domestic-violence evidence, the error was harmless because the court found Craig's evidence not credible. The court also rejected Craig's procedural challenges concerning relocation, witness notes, self-representation, unresolved motions, and alleged surprise. Craig's reconsideration arguments were waived on appeal.