State v. Solis

Summary

The court affirmed Solis’s criminal judgment and held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by requiring sex-offender registration after his misdemeanor indecent-exposure conviction. The registration statute establishes registration as the general rule and permits, but does not require, deviation when specified criteria are satisfied; findings on those criteria are required only if the court chooses to deviate. The district court gave a reasoned explanation for declining to deviate.