Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership

Summary

The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. It held that genuine disputes remained concerning whether Northstar breached its payment obligation, whether Tundra intentionally interfered with Northstar's contract, and whether Tundra could avoid indemnification through equitable estoppel. The court affirmed dismissal of Tundra's warranty-deed claim because Tundra waived its challenge to an independent basis for dismissal.