Holm v. Holm

Summary

The Court affirmed the divorce judgment and related orders. It held that the appellant's discovery brief was untimely, that the incorrect statutory valuation date was harmless because the court used agreed valuations and no prejudice was shown, and that the challenged property valuations and ownership finding were supported by the evidence and credibility determinations. The Court also held that the appellant waived any challenge to the district court's application of the governing equitable-distribution factors by failing to brief it adequately.