Ebel v. Engelhart

Summary

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s judgment, holding that valid contracts existed between the Ebels and the Estate, that no contract existed between Gross and the Estate, that Gross’s arguments were not preserved for appeal, that Gross was not a good‑faith purchaser with superior interest, and that Gross’s conduct was justified, so the Ebels’ tortious‑interference claim was properly dismissed.