State v. Harvin

Summary

The Court held that defendant did not forfeit his constitutional right to counsel by requesting the withdrawal of two attorneys, representing himself for several months, and requesting appointed counsel on the day of trial. His conduct was not sufficiently egregious because he remained respectful, did not threaten or disrupt the proceedings, and was attempting to protect his rights while struggling to prepare for trial. The Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ order vacating the convictions and remanded for a new trial on all charges.