People v. Brazeal

Summary

The court held that the warrantless-search probation condition imposed on Jarelle Brazeal was an abuse of sentencing discretion because it was not individually tailored to his offense, history, or rehabilitative needs, and it struck that condition while otherwise affirming. The court declined to reach Miguelina Lora's statutory and constitutional challenges because she did not preserve them by objecting to the condition at sentencing. The court distinguished challenges asserting that a sentence is categorically unauthorized from challenges asserting that a discretionary condition was unwarranted in a particular defendant's circumstances.