The People of the State of New York v. Edward De Mauro

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division’s order, holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the defendant’s statements, in refusing a mistrial, and in rejecting the ineffective‑assistance claim. The Court found the first statement was voluntarily given and that the other statements were properly admitted, and it concluded that the defendant’s procedural objections were not preserved for review.