May E. Sperling, as of Richard H. Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Company

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment creditor's action, holding that the family automobile policy covers a relative driving a non‑owned vehicle that is not regularly furnished, even when the vehicle was stolen, and therefore the insurer must pay the judgment. The dissent argued the policy should not cover a stolen car and would reverse the judgment.