Mahlon Mandeville, Respondent v. Schuyler C. Reynolds, Appellant

Summary

The Court affirmed the judgment, holding that secondary evidence is admissible when a judgment roll is lost or destroyed, that a defendant's confession of judgment is competent evidence, that an attorney cannot satisfy a judgment without the client’s consent or full payment, that a docket entry of satisfaction may be attacked for fraud in an action upon the judgment, and that an assignment without payment does not give authority to satisfy the judgment.