Mary D. Sloan, Respondent v. the New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, holding that the trial court correctly admitted impeachment evidence of the superintendent's out‑of‑court statements, that the form of the impeachment question was permissible, that the attendant's testimony was admissible as factual, and that the physician's question about a venereal disease was properly excluded as privileged.