Carman v. Pultz

Summary

The Court affirmed the judgment, holding that a vendor's tender of a deed to one of two joint purchasers satisfies the contract and that the vendor is not required to make a separate tender to the other purchaser. The Court also found the promissory note enforceable despite the defendant's claim of lack of consideration, and declined to reverse the judgment on the ground that the deed tendered was allegedly deficient because the refusal to accept was not proven.