Nettles v. Ticonderoga Owners' Ass'n, Inc.

Summary

The New Mexico Supreme Court held that the amendment redefining common easements was uniform and therefore did not violate the uniformity requirement, but found that the reasonableness of the amendment is a factual question unsuitable for summary judgment, reversing that judgment and remanding. It affirmed summary judgment on the voting‑rights claim due to lack of record, and declined to rule on the developer‑representation issue, leaving the lower court's grant of summary judgment intact.