Kent Motor Cars, Inc., D/B/A Honda of Princeton, Sports and Specialist Cars, Inc., and Robert Burt…

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court's partial reversal of the trial court's summary judgment for Reynolds, holding that the CFA claim against Reynolds is barred by substantial prejudice while the contribution claim may proceed, and affirmed the dismissal of the insurance coverage claims against Universal because the Wilson claims do not arise under truth‑in‑lending or truth‑in‑leasing laws. The matter was remanded for further proceedings.