Fernando Roa and Liliana Roa, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Lafe and Marino Roa, Defendants-Appellants

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that Fernando's discharge claim is time‑barred because a discrete retaliatory act triggers the two‑year limitations period, rejected the application of the continuing‑violation doctrine to revive that claim, and found his post‑discharge insurance‑cancellation claim timely and independently actionable, remanding for further proceedings.