State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent v. William T. Evers, Defendant-Respondent and…

Summary

The Court held that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in AOL subscriber information, that New Jersey’s exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained via an out‑of‑state warrant, and that the presumption of imprisonment for a second‑degree child endangerment conviction was not overcome, reversing the sentencing and remanding for resentencing. Justice Coleman filed a concurring opinion.