State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Harry D. Sugar, Defendant-Respondent

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that the trial court erred in suppressing the victim’s body and ordered its admission under the inevitable discovery doctrine, finding that the State met its clear‑and‑convincing burden; the Court also affirmed that the eavesdropping on attorney‑client communications violated the Sixth Amendment but did not require dismissal of the charges.