Mario M. Medici, Plaintiff, and Madison Property Company No. 4, Intervenor-Appellant v. Bpr Company, a Limited…

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey reversed the Appellate Division and remanded, holding that for a commercial use variance not permitted by the zoning ordinance the applicant must prove, and the board must specifically find, that the site is particularly suitable and that special reasons exist, and that enhanced proof and specific findings are required under the 1985 MLUL amendments.