Harrington Glen, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. the Municipal Board of Adjustment…

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey reversed the Appellate Division and remanded the case to the Board of Adjustment, holding that the Board's denial of a variance was legally insufficient because it lacked the specific factual findings required by N.J.S.A. 40:55-39(c). The Court also overruled Kryscnski v. Shenkin, holding that a variance may not be conditioned on the purchase of adjoining land, and affirmed that a successor in title retains the right to seek variance relief.