The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent v. Paul W. Flanagin…

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that Ohio Casualty must defend both the personal injury and property damage actions arising from the wall collapse because the allegations in the complaints fall within the coverage of the Manufacturers and Contractors policy, and the policy’s exclusions do not bar such coverage. The Court affirmed the appellate court’s decision on the personal injury claims and reversed it on the property damage claims.