Florence Harris, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent v. Herman Perl and Ruth Perl, Defendants-Respondents and…

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey reversed the Appellate Division's judgment for the plaintiff against the Peris and affirmed the trial court's judgment for the plaintiff, holding that the Peris committed tortious interference with the plaintiff's prospective economic advantage and were liable for the lost commission. The Court also affirmed the judgments in favor of Cronin and affirmed the denial of the Peris' cross‑claim against the bank, finding no basis for contribution.