The State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Ralph Carbone and Loretta Franze, Defendants-Appellants

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey affirmed the convictions of Carbone and Eranze, holding that evidence of a co-conspirator's acts and statements is admissible against other conspirators even if the co-conspirator is not named in the indictment, and that a conspiracy may be proved with parties not charged. The court also found no error in the supplemental jury instruction concerning Eranze's knowledge.