Peter W. Kero, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Terminal Construction Corporation, a Corporation…

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey affirmed the judgment, holding that the alleged fraud in the execution of the releases was properly submitted to the jury and the trial court was correct in denying the defendant's motion for judgment. The court also held that the trial judge's erroneous instruction on consideration was not reversible because the defendant failed to timely object, and that the instruction regarding the "Paid in full" notation was proper.