State v. Rogers

Summary

The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that the police officers' alleged promise not to prosecute was not an enforceable contract because there was no meeting of the minds, and it clarified that the unit of prosecution for resisting arrest is the number of discrete volitional acts, affirming two convictions and vacating the others. The court affirmed the DUI conviction, vacated some resisting‑arrest convictions, and remanded for further proceedings.