In the Matter of Rourke & Rourke

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s modification of the parenting plan, holding that the trial court sustainably exercised its discretion under RSA 461‑A:11, I(g) and did not violate procedural due‑process rights. The Court found the appeal was properly preserved despite a pending motion for reconsideration, that the state‑constitutional due‑process claim was unpreserved, and that the federal‑constitutional due‑process claim was preserved.