In the Matter of Dana Albrecht and Katherine Albrecht

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of a contempt motion, finding the court’s discretionary exercise was not unsustainable, the delay did not constitute reversible error, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration based on a ten‑page limit was proper. The Court also held that newly raised arguments were waived and that the appeal was properly taken as a discretionary appeal.