John Doe v. Attorney General

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of Doe’s claim that RSA 105:13-b creates a cause of action to remove his name from the Exculpatory Evidence Schedule, holding that the statute’s review provisions apply only within the context of a particular criminal case. The court vacated the trial court’s due‑process ruling and remanded for further proceedings in light of the newly enacted RSA 105:13‑d, which may provide a statutory remedy.