State of New Hampshire v. Mohammad Salimullah

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss the 2016 indictments and its denial of a competency determination before sentencing, but reversed the imposition of a no‑contact condition on the defendant's stand‑committed sentence as contrary to RSA 651:2. The court held that RSA 135:17‑a does not bar re‑indictment after a dismissal without prejudice and that the trial court did not err in its competency findings, while a no‑contact order cannot be attached to an imprisonment term.