State v. Jonathan L. Woodbury

Summary

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed Jonathan L. Woodbury’s convictions for falsifying physical evidence and assault by a prisoner, as well as the sentences imposed. The Court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the falsifying‑evidence conviction, that the trial court correctly declined a jury instruction defining “official investigation,” that the multiple assault convictions did not violate double‑jeopardy protections, and that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a mutual‑combat instruction.