Zhang v. Zhang

Summary

The court held that Yanling was required to disclose a computation of her quantifiable damages under NRCP 16.1 and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that she failed to do so. But barring all damages evidence effectively terminated the case, so the district court was required to analyze the applicable factors governing case-ending discovery sanctions before dismissing the complaint. The court therefore vacated the dismissal and remanded for that analysis.