Robinson (maurice) v. State (criminal)

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court held that elder‑exploitation charges may be prosecuted only once per victim and that theft charges may be aggregated under a single scheme, vacating fourteen elder‑exploitation and fourteen theft convictions, affirming the remaining counts, and remanding for a revised judgment. The Court also found the jury instruction on elder neglect erroneous but harmless and affirmed the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the remaining convictions.