Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc. v. State of Nev. (civil)

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court held that the challengers had standing and that their facial vagueness challenge to the parental-notification and judicial-bypass provisions was ripe. It concluded that the provisions were subject to the criminal-statute vagueness standard, that the challengers showed a reasonable likelihood of success and irreparable harm, and that the balance of hardships and public interests favored preliminary relief. The court therefore reversed the denial of a preliminary injunction and remanded with instructions to grant it.