Friedlander v. Tamarack Junction Race & Sports Book (civil)

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Friedlander's petition for judicial review of a Nevada Gaming Control Board decision concerning the payout of two Kentucky Derby wagers. The court held that the Board reasonably determined that William Hill's conspicuously displayed house rules provided constructive notice of capped odds, which governed the wagers despite Friedlander’s lack of actual knowledge. The court further held that the Board's decision was supported by evidence and was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.