Young (andrew) v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Young's convictions and sentence except for one larceny-from-the-person conviction. It held that the district court properly retained a juror who expressed sympathy for the victims, that the evidence and challenged evidentiary rulings did not warrant relief, and that most jury-instruction and habitual-criminal arguments failed. The court reversed count 2 because the larceny-from-the-person instruction permitted conviction when property was merely within the victim's reach or control rather than actually on or attached to the victim. No separate opinions were filed.