Camacho (ocean) v. State

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed Camacho's convictions, holding that the pretrial identification was not unnecessarily suggestive, his police statements were voluntary after a valid Miranda advisement, and the delayed pretrial rulings, authentication ruling, and denial of severance did not warrant relief. The court held that the flight instruction was improper because the State presented no evidence that Camacho left with a consciousness of guilt or to avoid arrest, but concluded the error was harmless in light of the substantial evidence of guilt. The court also rejected Camacho's cumulative-error claim because he established only one harmless error.