Tahican, LLC v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

Summary

The Nevada Supreme Court held that a fraudulent‑transfer claim seeking avoidance of a real‑property transfer qualifies as an “action affecting the title or possession of real property” under NRS 14.010(1), and therefore supports the recording of a lis pendens. Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Tahican’s motion to expunge the lis pendens and the petition for a writ of mandamus was denied.