Hi-Tech Aggregate, LLC v. Pavestone, LLC

Summary

The court affirmed the judgment for Pavestone on its implied-warranty claim, holding that a seller need only have reason to know the buyer's particular purpose and that a buyer need not discover a latent defect through testing that would not ordinarily reveal it. The court reversed the judgment on Pavestone's noncontractual claims because the economic loss doctrine barred recovery absent sufficient evidence of personal injury or damage to property other than the integrated product itself. The court did not reach the negligence claim because the parties did not challenge the district court's failure to address it.