Raspperry (Kevin) v. State

Summary

The court affirmed the judgment of conviction for multiple driving-under-the-influence, reckless-driving, and controlled-substance offenses. It rejected the statutory and constitutional speedy-trial claims, found sufficient evidence and no reversible evidentiary, juror-bias, prosecutorial-misconduct, sentencing, or cumulative error, and held that the confrontation violation caused by remote testimony was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.