Mueller v. Hinds C/W 84077

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Craig Mueller's request to set aside or modify the marital settlement agreement because the parties had mutually assented to sufficiently definite material terms, and the record supported the findings rejecting his fraud, omitted-asset, impossibility, material-breach, and prevailing-party arguments. The court reversed the denial of Cristina Hinds's attorney-fee request because her motion was timely, so the filing rule did not prevent the district court from extending the deadline for supporting materials. The matter was remanded for the district court to decide whether to extend that deadline and consider the fee request.