Iliescu v. Reg'l Transp. Comm'n

Summary

The Nevada Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the waste and injunctive‑relief claims and upheld summary judgment on the contract‑based claims, but reversed the summary‑judgment rulings on the trespass and declaratory‑relief claims and vacated the attorney‑fees award. The court held that the RTC was not a tenant of the parking lot, that an injunction is a remedy not a cause of action, that the Iliescus failed to show causation or damages on their breach‑of‑contract claim, that genuine factual disputes existed as to trespass and that nominal damages were not waived; consequently the case was remanded for further proceedings on those claims.