State v. Dicken

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed Dicken’s burglary conviction and sentence, holding that the information sufficiently charged burglary even though it identified stalking as the intended felony. The information used the statutory burglary language, identified the intended felony, and alternatively alleged an intent to steal property of any value, thereby providing adequate notice. The court also rejected Dicken’s challenge to the conviction and sentence because the information was sufficient and he did not object to the factual basis for his guilty plea.