State v. Dale

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s sentencing judgment, holding that the trial court did not err by imposing a probation condition requiring reimbursement of Humane Society fees without informing the defendant at the plea hearing, that the defendant forfeited challenges to the condition by not objecting at sentencing, and that no plain error existed despite the lack of a specified reimbursement amount. The court applied the abuse‑of‑discretion standard and found no reversible error.