State v. Ramos

Summary

The court affirmed Ramos's convictions and life sentence, rejecting challenges based on constitutional delay, jury selection, late discovery, the denial of a new trial, lay identification testimony, witness transport, and residual hearsay. It held that most post-mistrial delay was attributable to Ramos's own motions and appeals, the undisclosed evidence was not material or prejudicial, and the challenged evidentiary rulings were within the district court's discretion. No separate opinions were filed.